Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$51K$43K$5K$1K$2K$6K$8K$11K$67K$7K$8K$8K$10K$9K$9K$29K$8K$10K$10K$112K
Average discount rate85%80%50%40%60%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%80%75%76%75%78%75%
Schools & libraries (in this area)2222222222
Service providers112222344333345555236
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$698$1K$2K
Telecomm Services$6K$6K$6K$6K$6K$7K$8K$8K$8K$9K$10K$6K$10K
Internal Connections$51K$43K$5K$59K$8K$10K$112K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$5K$1K$1K$1K$1K$780$720$11K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Mio-Ausable Elementary School$28K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$1K$28K$5K$3K
Mio-Ausable High School$28K$2K$4K$4K$4K$4K$4K$38K$5K$3K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Mio-Ausable Elementary SchoolMio85%2442441,0001,000Rural
Mio-Ausable High SchoolMio85%2672671,0001,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Ascomnorth, Inc.$88K
Sehi Computer Products, Inc.$59K
Winn Telephone Company$6K$8K$8K$8K$8K$9K$5K
Moss Telecommunications Services$51K
Gracon Services, Inc.$43K
Michigan Access, Inc$5K$5K$5K$5K$5K
Northern Educational Solutions, inc.$22K
Kremer Systems,dba Innovative Technoligies Grp-Saginaw/Flint$17K
Gaggle.net, Inc.$2K$2K$1K$1K$1K$1K$780$720$2K$2K
Internet Products, Inc.$10K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.