Escanaba Area Public School District
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $42K | $125K | $61K | $49K | $17K | $46K | $10K | $12K | $10K | $14K | $17K | — | $36K | $37K | $41K | $41K | $31K | $19K | $19K | $24K | $28K | $23K | $20K | — | $9K | — | $51K | $1K |
| Average discount rate | 80% | 80% | 80% | 83% | 83% | 83% | 85% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 55% | — | 72% | 72% | 71% | 72% | 71% | 73% | 71% | 70% | 71% | 72% | 70% | — | 64% | 65% | 60% | 60% |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | — | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 | 250 | 250 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 250 | 250 | 250 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K | $7K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $10K | — | $36K | $37K | $16K | $16K | $16K | $17K | $17K | $24K | $28K | $23K | $20K | — | $9K | — | $8K | $1K |
| Internal Connections | $42K | $125K | $61K | $49K | $17K | $46K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $43K | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | — | — | — | — | — | — | $10K | $12K | $10K | $10K | — | — | — | — | $25K | $25K | $15K | $2K | $2K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escanaba Jrsr High School | $16K | $127K | $46K | $22K | $7K | $8K | $218 | $327 | $1K | $2K |
| Escanaba Junior High School | — | — | — | $15K | $5K | $5K | $218 | $327 | $1K | $2K |
| Escanaba Upper Elementary School | $13K | $132K | $13K | $9K | $7K | $5K | $5K | $6K | $6K | $7K |
| Soo Hill Elementary School | — | — | — | $4K | $5K | $126 | $5K | $6K | $6K | $7K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Escanaba Jrsr High School | Escanaba | 80% | 1,042 | 720 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Escanaba Junior High School | Escanaba | 80% | 458 | 309 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
| Escanaba Upper Elementary School | Escanaba | 80% | 433 | 299 | 10,000 | 10,000 | Rural |
| Soo Hill Elementary School | Escanaba | 80% | 0 | 0 | 200,000 | 200,000 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMCO HBS Holdings LP | $42K | $125K | $61K | $49K | — | $46K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| SBC Michigan | — | — | — | — | — | — | $10K | $12K | $10K | $10K | $13K | — | $29K | $30K | $34K | $34K | $31K | $19K | $19K | $24K | — | $23K | — | — | $8K | — | $6K | — |
| SBC Global Services, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $28K | — | $19K | — | — | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $3K | $4K | — | $7K | $7K | $6K | $6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $26K | — |
| Teck Solutions, Inc | — | — | — | — | $17K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telephone Contractors of Upper Michigan, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $17K | — |
| Windstream Communications, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | — | $1K | — | $2K | $1K |
| SBC Long Distance, LLC. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $167 | — | $387 | $247 | $262 | $452 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telnet Worldwide, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.