Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$66K$4K$16K$16K$18K$7K$9K$9K$10K$10K$13K$35K$33K$36K$19K$19K$11K$16K
Average discount rate70%60%80%65%60%70%52%48%47%58%53%50%51%50%60%60%60%60%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2115523335663333333
Avg download speed (Mbps)10010010020
Avg upload speed (Mbps)10010010020

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K$6K$12K
Telecomm Services$2K$5K$5K$6K$5K$10K$17K$15K$17K$69$3K
Internal Connections$57K$8K$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$9K$4K$4K$5K$6K$5K$4K$4K$5K$5K$3K$18K$19K$19K$19K$19K$11K$13K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Clinton County Education Cntr$1K$62K$129$110$154$348$218$1K$11K$7K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Clinton County Education CntrSaint Johns60%487222200,000200,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Middle Michigan Network for Educational Telecommunications$18K$19K$19K$19K$19K$11K$13K
Moss Telecommunications Services$66K$4K
Verizon North Incorporated$4K$6K$12K$1K$6K$11K$11K$15K$69$3K
Merit Network, Inc.$4K$4K$5K$6K$5K$4K$4K$5K$4K$3K
Windstream Communications, Inc.$510$3K$6K$4K$2K
Westphalia Broadband Inc$4K$4K$4K$2K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$2K$1K$936$1K$1K$645
Cablexpress Corporation$4K
CDI Computers (US) Corp.$4K
AllTel Communications$543

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.