Detroit Catholic Central High School

Billed Entity 55327 · Michigan

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$2K$2K$2K$20K$2K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$7K$6K$6K$7K$3K$3K$10K$749$15K$15K$7K
Average discount rate20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers111211121112243323211333
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000300300300300300
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,000300300300300300

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$2K$2K$3K$3K$3K$10K$11K$7K$7K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$2K$2K$20K$2K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$7K$4K$4K$4K$749$4K$8K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Detroit Catholic Central High School$2K$2K$2K$21K$2K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Detroit Catholic Central High SchoolNovi20%1,05901,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Bright House Networks, LLC$11K$11K$7K$6K$6K$4K
SBC Michigan$2K$2K$2K$8K$8K$7K$7K
Bright House Networks, LLC$11K$11K$11K
Inacomptechnical Services Group, LLC$19K
Merit Network Inc.$8K
Qwest Communications Corporation$749$4K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$2K$599$2K
123.Net, Inc$2K$2K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P. $354$395$492$770$1K
AT&T Corp.$3K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.