Two Rivers Supervisory Union

Billed Entity 16071864 · Vermont

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$91K$103K$122K$80K$130K$99K$87K$76K$92K$169K$87K$72K$59K
Average discount rate90%80%70%70%70%70%70%70%46%58%71%81%83%
Schools & libraries (in this area)6666666677
Service providers1223335137535
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,1671,1671,1671,1671,000750658542542542
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,1671,1671,1671,1671,000750658542542542

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$3K$18K$18K
Telecomm Services$40K$33K
Internal Connections$6K$32K$27K$46K$20K$12K$14K$64K$27K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$91K$97K$85K$49K$80K$77K$75K$76K$76K$86K$43K$32K$26K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$1K
Managed Internal Broadband Services$4K$4K$4K$2K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Black River Jr-Sr High School$8K$13K
Cavendish Town Elem School$12K$12K$13K$11K$19K$10K$10K$11K$11K$27K
Chester-Andover Elementary Sch$12K$12K$13K$11K$26K$18K$12K$11K$11K$26K
Green Mountain High School 35$31K$29K$44K$45K$53K$41K$37K$36K$38K$75K
Ludlow Elementary School$12K$12K$13K$15K$11K$9K$8K$11K$18K$27K
Mount Holly School$12K$12K$13K$11K$13K$15K$13K$4K$4K$13K
Two Rivers Supervisory Union District Office$31K$28K$24K$24K$9K$8K$7K$4K$5K$9K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Black River Jr-Sr High SchoolLudlow10%15071Rural
Cavendish Town Elem SchoolProctorsville85%68501,0001,000Rural
Chester-Andover Elementary SchChester90%2051821,0001,000Rural
Green Mountain High School 35Chester90%3132672,0002,000Rural
Ludlow Elementary SchoolLudlow90%82601,0001,000Rural
Mount Holly SchoolMount Holly90%99681,0001,000Rural
Two Rivers Supervisory Union District OfficeLudlow90%2,0002,000

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
ENA Services, LLC$91K$97K$85K$49K$80K$77K$75K$76K$76K$86K$7K
Vermont Telephone Company, Inc.$3K$12K$42K$54K$33K
Whalley Computer Associates, Inc.$6K$36K$26K$40K$19K
Gov Connection, Inc.$1K$35K$27K
Arcomm Communications Corporation$5K$10K$3K$6K$29K
Ludlow Telephone Company$5K$9K$10K$10K
AT&T Mobility$2K$3K$8K$13K
Passive Partners Ltd$14K
Key Communications Inc.$5K
NK Techonologies, Inc.$3K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.